The forthcoming presidential election has been one of the most turbulent to date.
After all, in under a month, the Dems knifed Biden following his debate performance – with Pelosi taking the biggest plunge, apparently – and coronated Kamala Harris as their candidate, happily disregarding the so-called “democracy” that they claim Republicans threaten.
Meanwhile, during the same time period, Trump survived an assassination attempt, which the media all but appears to have forgotten about, given their vicious treatment of Trump and sickening adulation of Harris, who has been a running joke for years.
Nonetheless, as demoralizing as the Democrats’ shameless behavior has been over the last several weeks, glimmers of hope have emerged as some Democrat voters appear more sensical than the party’s “progressive” leadership.
As more than one Democrat voter has resoundingly kicked out utterly shameless, blatantly anti-American “Squad” members.
New York Representative Jamaal Bowman, for instance, was summarily voted out following his despicable support of pro-terrorist protestors.
Now, Missouri Representative Cori Bush, best known for being a rabid BLM activist before being elected to Congress, has been summarily voted out, in large part due to her pitiable support of terrorists.
Needless to say, Israel PAC, also known as AIPAC, was thrilled.
“AIPAC and our 4.5 million grassroots members were proud to help progressive pro-Israel leader Wesley Bell defeat anti-Israel Squad member Rep. Cori Bush last night,” the group proudly announced on X.
In a separate statement, the group also noted that Bush has long been “hostile” towards them.
“Cori Bush has been one of the most hostile critics of Israel since she came to Congress in 2021 and has actively worked to undermine mainstream Democratic support for the U.S.-Israel relationship,” AIPAC remarked.
Mark Mellman, who serves as Chairman of the Democratic Majority for AIPAC, also commented on his relief following Bush’s ouster.
“Wesley Bell’s victory and Cori Bush’s defeat underscore what we’ve seen in races across the country and throughout this election cycle – being pro-Israel is not just wise policy, but also smart politics,” Mellman declared.
Indeed.
Needless to say, Bush’s response was anything but “smart politics” … but it was very much in alignment with her violent “activism” before she was first installed in Congress.
As a primary election watch party in Missouri, Bush ranted and raved that AIPAC’s efforts to secure her removal had hardly disempowered her.
“Pulling me away from my position as congresswoman, all you did was take some of the strings off,” Bush screeched, in reference to the decorum standards that used to motivate Congressional representatives.
At least at one point in time, until AOC and her Soros-funded, anti-American ilk arrived.
Bush also threatened that people would now “see this other Cori, this other side.”
With respect, Ms. Bush, most of the nation, at least those with a clue, already saw the “other Cori.”
After all, she was amongst the rabid BLM activists who famously hassled the Mark and Patricia McCloskey, outside their private home, in a private neighborhood, prompting the couple to engage in preliminary self-defense.
Naturally, Democrats elected Bush to Congress in 2020, though it seems her violent BLM rhetoric is out of style now.
After all, illegal migrants are now Dems’ favorite group to exploit for votes, both in the future and present.
Meanwhile, Bush is apparently spiraling with rage over the fact she cannot become yet another ultra-rich Congressional representative, a la Pelosi, and she responded exactly as a violent “activist” would respond – making threats.
Throughout Bush’s rant, she apparently screamed and shouted so loudly that her microphone shook, demonstrating the degree of rage and wrath that truly does appear to propel most of the woke today.
“AIPAC, I’m coming to tear your kingdom down,” Bush screamed.
Is that so?
Rather violent rhetoric, all of a month after Dems claimed they would tone down rhetoric after the attempted Trump assassination.
Even the White House jumped in, with the perennially clueless press secretary condemning Bush’s remarks.
“The President has always been very clear and very recently after the assassination attempt of the last president about lowering rhetoric – lowering the rhetoric and the importance of doing that …
It is important that we be very mindful of what we say. This kind of rhetoric is inflammatory, and divisive and incredibly unhelpful. And we’re going to condemn any type of political rhetoric in that way, in that vein, and so it is important to be mindful in what we say and how we say it. But we cannot have this type of inflammatory and divisive language in our political discourse,” Karine Jean-Pierre asserted.
Good luck with that one, Ms. Jean-Pierre.
In the meantime, Bush’s resounding loss is not a good omen for the Harris-Walz campaign … especially as both Harris and Walz are shameless supporters of criminals.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
