Of all the “pot calling the kettle black” moments exuded by progressive liberals, perhaps the most obnoxiously obvious of all includes all the claims that President-elect Donald Trump poses an apparent “threat” to democracy.
Especially when elitist, rather Marxist academics publish “informed” opinion pieces that directly call for subversion of democracy.
In a rather chillingly titled editorial, Evan Davis and David Schulte – both of whom are “legal authorities” at pro-terrorist Ivy League Institutions – argue that Trump apparently can be blocked from assuming the presidency, per some twisted interpretation of existing law.
The twisted interpretation is unsurprising, considering that the editorial already features a rather bald title – “Congress has the power to block Trump from taking office, but lawmakers must act now” – and it only gets worse from there, the more one begins to read.
“The Constitution provides that an oath-breaking insurrectionist is ineligible to be president. This is the plain wording of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution … Disqualification is based on insurrection against the Constitution and not the government. The evidence of Donald Trump’s engaging in such insurrection is overwhelming. The matter has been decided in three separate forums, two of which were fully contested with the active participation of Trump’s counsel,” the woke Ivy League professors wrote.
The professors then proceeded to regurgitate various woke “arguments” in a fancily worded fashion, as if all the legal language in the world could excuse the very undemocratic process that they are blatantly advocating.
Even more astonishingly, near the end of the editorial, both law professors argue for an insane situation in Comrade Kamala would become president.
“To make an objection under the Count Act requires a petition signed by 20 percent of the members of each House. If the objection is sustained by majority vote in each house, the vote is not counted and the number of votes required to be elected is reduced by the number of disqualified votes. If all votes for Trump were not counted, Kamala Harris would be elected president,” the legal professors added.
Right. The candidate who never even received a single primary vote for the presidential position.
Real democratic, right there.
And, like typical leftist elitists, the professors concluded on an additionally pedantic note, chiefly by claiming that Democrats needed to take a so-called stand against Trump ascending to office, as part of their constitutional duties.
“The unlikelihood of congressional Republicans doing anything that might elect Harris as president is obvious. But Democrats need to take a stand against Electoral College votes for a person disqualified by the Constitution from holding office unless and until this disability is removed. No less is required by their oath to support and defend the Constitution,” the legal professors boomed.
Uh huh.
Yes, when reviewing such elitist diatribe, it does seem that the ultra-left, rather than sensible conservatives, are the ones who
Especially since liberals themselves are the ones who have demonstrated wholly undemocratic behavior, time and time again.
They began with the absurd weaponization of the court system against Trump, shortly after he announced he would be running again … a weaponization that arguably served to augment his popularity.
His popularity was further augmented when it turned out the individuals overseeing the court proceedings were significantly corrupt themselves, from Georgia to New York.
In the meantime, the Democrats hid Biden’s real condition from the world, arbitrarily shoved in Kamala as their candidate when Biden flailed out, then proceeded to wonder how on earth Trump smashed the electoral vote and popular vote in the most recent election.
Now, even after Trump has resoundingly won in 2024, ultra-elitists are still pushing for Trump to be pushed out, perhaps one of the more dangerous pieces of propaganda to float about in the mainstream media.
That said, while it appears unlikely that urgings of elitist “law professors” will be taken seriously, the fact that such undemocratic drivel is in print in the first place – in a “reputable” publication – remains deeply disheartening.
With any luck, the United States will return to the path originally envisioned in its creation, despite rabid elitists’ efforts to destroy it.
Author: Jane Jones
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.
To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].
Family-Friendly Content
Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More
